Good to know

Results & editorial standards

Clear distinctions make the work easier to judge: what was built, who contributed, what changed, and what the evidence actually supports.

Updated November 4, 2026

Give the work its correct attribution

A company project is not automatically an individual achievement. Case studies should identify the team or organization responsible and name Taylor’s contribution when that contribution is established. Combined founder experience and company-wide totals should keep those labels.

The site includes selected work from Leads To Sales. A company portfolio source can support the description of a project without establishing that Taylor alone created every component.

Different evidence answers different questions

EvidenceWhat it can showWhat it should not imply
Website or interface screenshotThe design and functionality presented in that view.A measured business outcome by itself.
Search reportSearch activity for its stated dates and settings.Signed contracts or revenue.
Client statementThat person’s attributed account.An independent audit of every underlying result.
Prototype or conceptA proposed interaction or direction.A launched system or completed installation.
Rating or awardThe exact rating or recognition described by its source.A different issuer, category, ranking or personal award.

Keep the period and source with the result

A useful result states the relevant period, baseline, measure, and source. If a figure comes from the project team, the case should say so. Rounded figures and upper bounds should remain identifiable. Comparisons should not quietly change their date ranges or definitions.

Where a case reports opportunities or projects, those should be kept separate from search impressions and clicks. No revenue amount should be inferred from a job description without supporting information.

Teaching material and illustrative media

Public articles, checklists and scripts are prepared to help owners think through practical problems. Illustrative scenarios, names, tables and diagnostic frameworks are teaching devices, not additional client case studies.

Stock film and representative imagery should retain their context. They are not proof that a depicted project belongs to Taylor or a featured client. Credits identify the principal media sources.

Corrections are part of keeping the record useful

If you are connected to a featured project and see an attribution or factual issue, contact contact@taylormoses.com with the page and the detail involved. Claims, links and project status should be reviewed as better evidence becomes available.